Jun. 17th, 2010

affablyevil: (is there nothing in this world but grief)
Is it more sexist to prefer to map onto male leads than female secondary characters,

or

is it more sexist to demand that female-bodied viewers map onto female characters?








This is in a cisnormative vacuum, I think. Oh, fandom.


On another note, I get particularly annoyed when fans argue that as characters, there is no differentiation between Castiel and Anna besides their (vessels/bodies'/etc.) sex, so the reason that fandom prefers one over the other is primarily due to sex. That sort simplification really bothers me, because there are other thematics at work in the story — humanism, faith, redemption, trust — alongside nuances like mistrust of executed romance storylines, gender difference, or Dean reading as queer to a lot of viewers, that all plays into it.

On a more personal note, I may be a minority in this, but one of the reasons I find Castiel so relatable is because he isn't human. So a storyline about a character who enters the narrative as a human and becomes an ally is much less emotionally interesting to me than a character who has to learn how to relate to humans and becomes an ally.

That being said, I would love to see Anna again. I was the most impressed with her when she decided to kill the two characters that make the show happen.

Profile

affablyevil: (Default)
affably

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 03:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios